You thought that buglist was soon over ?

sadly for you, I've tracked (using the Contents.gz of the archive) all the packages that seemed to have private python modules. I've found many that were even not compliant with the previous python policy (and that shiped public extensions btw), and a big lot that need update.

I'm way to tired to launch the big mass bug now, because I've worked more than 2 hours straight on that, looking at almost a hundred of packages list files in the eyes, to know if there was a tiiiiiiny python module hidden in there. Still expect it soon…

Sadly, it does not looks so good: my first list was 265 packages long, I suppose there is a whole bunch of false-positives, but I fear there will remain in the 200 bugs.

Though, this is the final step. If you do maintain a package that depends upon python, please help ! Migrating your package to the new policy is often easy if you use debhelper/cdbs/… and other high-level packaging tools.