MadBlog
Sunday 6 April 2008

[RC-Bug-A-Day] Day 19

Today is again about removing packages from testing as my hintfile says. We've discussed (in the RM team) policy a bit, and it seems that we agree that packages with Release Critical bugs open for more than 3 weeks without any kind of activity from the Maintainer warrant a removal from testing without prior notification. Tonight's work is then just doing the quite not fascinating work of going through this list and look for removal candidates.

Note that we will always give more time to Maintainers that need it to fix a bug, if he/she states so in the bug report. Needing time is perfectly okay. Not telling about it isn't.

[RC-Bug-A-Day] Day 18

Paid work burnt all my free time recenlty, that's why there wasn't a rc-bug-a-day for two days. I'm back with two removals, a couple of gcc-4.3 FTBFSes fixed. And 5 uploads for RG bugs from Sandro Tosi that were rotting in my mail client.

The bad news for tonight is that gcc-4.3 FTBFSes are now RC, since it's the default compiler on several architectures. That's almost 40 new RC we now have to deal with. The fun part will be that those RC will probably hinder some transitions to testing. Maintainers, please, fix your packages. There are still too many packages with RG bugs on them, open for many days, from maintainer that are otherwise quite active on IRC or the lists…

Thursday 3 April 2008

[RC-Bug-A-Day] Day 17

Today's RC bug was 470462, removal of a package that as a patch for a FTBFS and absolutely no maintainer answers (#417047).

I'm also quite excited because I have a mail with 9 nmudiff's for RG/RC bugs waiting to be processed from Sandro Tosi. I want MOAR !

Tuesday 1 April 2008

[RC-Bug-A-Day] Day 16

There was no RC-Bug-A-Day yesterday, so two RC bugs for today:

  • #463094 some missing ${subst:Stuff} in a debian/control;
  • #456864 some other missing Build-Dependency causing a FTBFS.

I also plan to sponsor the requests piling in my @debian.org mailbox tonight too.